Editor's noteAn earlier version of this page (data as of September 2024) was published with several factual errors — most notably the two elementary schools were swapped throughout, one project's FMP baseline was wrong, and the headline percentages were stale. Every figure on the site has now been re-run against the District's May 21, 2026 Measure LCF expenditure update (financials as of April 30, 2026).
The La Cañada LedgerVol. 1 · Independent · Community-Maintained

An editorial · May 2026 report · financials as of April 30, 2026

We love LCF.
That's exactly why
we're voting NO
on Measure LCF.

The District's own May 2026 Measure LCF expenditure update shows a pattern any homeowner would recognize: scope quietly enlarged, big-ticket projects skipped, line items running 30 to 200 percent over budget. Before we authorize another bond, we think the community deserves to read the receipts on the last one.

Exhibit A

The five biggest blowouts.

View all 26 line items →
  1. 01

    Modernization + Building Systems

    Palm Crest Elementary

    199% over the FMP estimate — the largest percentage variance in the program. Caveat: the report subtotal bundles roof repair, playground and surveys that the FMP line did not, so the comparison is semi-comparable.

    FMP 2017

    $3,536,736

    SPENT

    $10,589,760

    +199%

  2. 02

    Site Utilities

    Palm Crest Elementary

    91% over FMP. About $243K of the figure is a fencing entry-adjustment booked against utilities; net of that mis-booking the true overrun is closer to +77%.

    FMP 2017

    $1,745,609

    SPENT

    $3,336,738

    +91%

  3. 03

    Safety & Security

    Paradise Canyon Elementary

    81% over the FMP estimate. Composition: $203,885 S&S plus $663,680 fencing.

    FMP 2017

    $478,800

    SPENT

    $867,565

    +81%

  4. 04

    25yd × 33m Pool

    La Cañada Jr./High

    Scope enlargement, not a pure overrun: the FMP specified a 25yd × 33m pool; a 40m pool was built. Now $13.64M committed against the $8.45M FMP line — a 61% increase tied to an enlarged scope the community was not asked about.

    FMP 2017

    $8,452,070

    SPENT

    $13,643,763

    +61%

  5. 05

    HVAC

    La Cañada Elementary

    Now $996K (Project 95120 plus CalSHAPE), up from just $60K in April 2024. Against the FMP HVAC line of $637K, that is 56% over.

    FMP 2017

    $636,800

    SPENT

    $996,417

    +56%

Exhibit B

Projects that quietly disappeared.

These line items were promised in the 2017 Facilities Master Plan. They still show zero spending in the District's May 2026 Measure LCF expenditure update.

  • La Cañada Jr./High

    Stadium Home Bleachers

    $1,574,917

    budgeted in 2017 · $0 reported spent

  • La Cañada Elementary

    2-Story Classroom Building

    $16,492,153

    budgeted in 2017 · $0 reported spent

Exhibit C

Taxed, but not allowed to vote.

The Sagebrush area's territory transfer into LCUSD does not take effect until July 1, 2026 — after the Measure LCF election. Sagebrush residents are not eligible to vote on the measure, yet once the transfer closes they will be inside the district boundary and bound by the tax assessment for the next several decades.

Whatever you think of the bond's merits, asking a neighborhood to pay for a 30-year obligation it had no voice in approving is not a fair way to start a new chapter of the district.

The argument, in brief

"Yes" requires evidence. We have the opposite.

This is not an anti-school site. La Cañada Unified is the reason a lot of us moved here. The teachers are extraordinary, the kids are thriving, and the physical plant genuinely does need investment.

But "we need to fix the buildings" is not a defense of this measure. The 2017 bond promised a specific list of projects at specific prices. Seven years later, several of the most expensive promises are simply gone from the books, while other line items have run double or triple their estimates with little public explanation.

Before authorizing a new bond, the District owes the community a clean, project-by-project reconciliation of the last one.

Yes on LCF.

No on Measure LCF.

We love this community. That's exactly why we read the receipts before signing a new check.

Read

Disclosure

This is an independent, non-committee informational site. It does not solicit or accept contributions and is not coordinated with any campaign committee. All figures are drawn from public records — the 2017 Facilities Master Plan and the District's May 21, 2026 Measure LCF Citizens' Oversight Committee Project Expenditure Update (financials as of April 30, 2026).

© 2026 YesOnLCF.com — community-maintained.Last data update: May 2026 (financials as of 4/30/2026)